PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i5-13400F FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i5-13400F: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x7835RE

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($127 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
✅Draws 12W instead of 65W, a 53W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics (32EU), while Core i5-13400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,795 vs 25,029).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 53.5 vs 127.7 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $196 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13400F.

Core i5-13400F

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +75.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).
✅Delivers 138.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 127.7 vs 53.5 PassMark/$ ($196 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
✅122.2% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 9) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Atom x7835RE.

Trade-offs

❌
54.3% HIGHER MSRP
$196 MSRPvs$127 MSRP
❌441.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 12W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x7835RE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13400F better than Atom x7835RE?

Yes. Core i5-13400F is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 75.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 268.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13400F is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 75.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13400F is the stronger fit. You are getting 268.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 233.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 6 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13400F is the better buy right now. Core i5-13400F comes in 54.3% more expensive on MSRP at $196 MSRP versus $127 MSRP, and it still gives you a 75.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 138.7% better value on MSRP (127.7 vs 53.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x7835RE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Atom x7835RE vs Core i5-13400F Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x7835RE

The Atom x7835RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per module). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 6,795 points. Launch price was $127.

Core i5-13400F

The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x7835RE packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Atom x7835RE versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 24.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-13400F (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Atom x7835RE uses the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x7835RE scores 6,795 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 114.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Atom x7835RE vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i5-13400F
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	10 / 16+25%
Boost Clock	3.6 GHz	4.6 GHz+28%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.5 GHz+92%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per module)+60%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	10 nm	Intel 7 nm-30%
Architecture	Amston Lake (2024−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	6,795	25,029+268%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,211
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,407
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,408

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x7835RE uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom x7835RE) vs 2 (Core i5-13400F). PCIe lanes: 9 (Atom x7835RE) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Core i5-13400F offers 11 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel BGA1264 (Atom x7835RE) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i5-13400F
Socket	FCBGA1264	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	192 GB+500%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	9	20+122%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x7835RE) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). The Atom x7835RE includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)), while the Core i5-13400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i5-13400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics (32EU)	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Atom x7835RE was priced at $127, while the Core i5-13400F came in at $196. On launch pricing ($127 vs $196), Atom x7835RE was $69 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Atom x7835RE delivers 53.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 81.9% better value option.

Feature	Atom x7835RE	Core i5-13400F
MSRP	$127-35%	$196
Performance per Dollar	53.5	127.7+139%
Release Date	2024	2023

Search Atom x7835RE on Amazon

Search Core i5-13400F on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.