Atom Z2760 vs PRO A6-9500E

Atom Z2760 vs PRO A6-9500E Performance Spectrum

Atom Z2760

2 / 4

1,697

+0.5%

1,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z2760 vs PRO A6-9500E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z2760 vs PRO A6-9500E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z2760

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 3W instead of 35W, a 32W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel GMA 3650, while PRO A6-9500E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

PRO A6-9500E

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,689 vs 1,697).
❌1066.7% higher power demand at 35W vs 3W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z2760 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z2760 better than PRO A6-9500E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-9500E is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2760 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z2760 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z2760 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z2760 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A6-9500E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-9500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom Z2760 vs PRO A6-9500E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z2760

The Atom Z2760 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Cloverview (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FC-MB4760. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,697 points. Launch price was $69.

PRO A6-9500E

The PRO A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,689 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z2760 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the PRO A6-9500E's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom Z2760 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-9500E — a 61.5% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500E (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Atom Z2760 uses the Cloverview (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the PRO A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z2760 scores 1,697 against the PRO A6-9500E's 1,689 — a 0.5% lead for the Atom Z2760.

Feature	Atom Z2760	PRO A6-9500E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+89%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	3 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1024 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Cloverview (2012)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,697	1,689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z2760 uses the FC-MB4760 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the PRO A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.