Atom Z540
VS
Athlon 64 2000+

Atom Z540 vs Athlon 64 2000+

Intel

Atom Z540

1 Cores2 Thrd2.4 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2008
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 2000+

1 Cores1 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom Z540 is positioned at rank 334 and the Athlon 64 2000+ is on rank 1088, so the Atom Z540 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom Z540

#322
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
481%
#323
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
474%
#324
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
435%
#325
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
433%
#326
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
429%
#328
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
414%
#329
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
397%
#330
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
397%
#331
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
386%
#334
Atom Z540
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#336
Xeon E3-1505M v5
MSRP: $115|Avg: $115
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 2000+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
94459%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
89255%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64806%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19523%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15465%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13528%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7748%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7647%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6963%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6962%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6885%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6699%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6605%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6578%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6519%
#1086
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
100%
#1087
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
100%
#1088
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#1089
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
99%
#1090
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1091
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
98%
#1092
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
94%
#1093
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
92%
#1094
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
86%
#1095
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1096
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
72%
#1097
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1098
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1099
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1100
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
64%
#1101
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
59%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 2000+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Atom Z540 in both compute-intensive tasks (7.9% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAtom Z540Athlon 64 2000+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Silverthorne (2008−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lima (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAtom Z540Athlon 64 2000+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom Z540 and Athlon 64 2000+

Intel

Atom Z540

The Atom Z540 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PBGA441. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.4 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 305 points. Launch price was $160.

AMD

Athlon 64 2000+

The Athlon 64 2000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lima (2008−2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 330 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Atom Z540 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Athlon 64 2000+'s 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.07 GHz on the Atom Z540 versus 1 GHz on the Athlon 64 2000+ — a 173.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 2000+. The Atom Z540 uses the Silverthorne (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 2000+ uses Lima (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z540 scores 305 against the Athlon 64 2000+'s 330 — a 7.9% lead for the Athlon 64 2000+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAtom Z540Athlon 64 2000+
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
1 / 1
Boost Clock
0.07 GHz
1 GHz+1329%
Base Clock
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Lima (2008−2009)
PassMark
305
330+8%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z540 uses the PBGA441 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 2000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-533 memory speed. The Athlon 64 2000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 2 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom Z540) vs 2 (Athlon 64 2000+). PCIe lanes: 0 (Atom Z540) vs 16 (Athlon 64 2000+) — the Athlon 64 2000+ offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel US15W (Atom Z540) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 2000+).

FeatureAtom Z540Athlon 64 2000+
Socket
PBGA441
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-533
DDR2-400
Max RAM Capacity
2 GB
16 GB+700%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16