C-70 vs Pentium G860

C-70 vs Pentium G860 Performance Spectrum

C-70

2 / 2

1,495

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G860

2 / 2

1,485

0.0%

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

C-70 vs Pentium G860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

C-70 vs Pentium G860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

C-70

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 9W instead of 256W, a 247W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium G860

2011

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,485 vs 1,495).
❌Launch MSRP is still $86 MSRP, while C-70 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2744.4% higher power demand at 256W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is C-70 better than Pentium G860?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium G860 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, C-70 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, C-70 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

C-70 is still the much better call for a fresh build. C-70 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. Pentium G860 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (17.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

C-70 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

C-70 vs Pentium G860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

C-70

The C-70 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 9 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,495 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G860

The Pentium G860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,485 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the C-70 and Pentium G860 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the C-70 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G860 — a 77.1% clock advantage for the Pentium G860 (base: 1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The C-70 uses the Ontario (2011−2012) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium G860 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the C-70 scores 1,495 against the Pentium G860's 1,485 — a 0.7% lead for the C-70. L3 cache: 0 kB on the C-70 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G860.

Feature	C-70	Pentium G860
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.33 GHz	3 GHz+126%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	40 nm	32 nm-20%
Architecture	Ontario (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,495	1,485

🧠

Memory & Platform

The C-70 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G860 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the C-70 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G860 — the Pentium G860 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G860 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (C-70) vs 2 (Pentium G860). PCIe lanes: 4 (C-70) vs 16 (Pentium G860) — the Pentium G860 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	C-70	Pentium G860
Socket	FT1	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	32 GB+700%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (C-70) / VT-x (Pentium G860). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7290 (C-70) and HD Graphics (Pentium G860) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium G860 targets Desktop.