Celeron 1020E vs Pentium N3710

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium N3710 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium N3710: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1020E

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $75 less on MSRP ($86 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 89.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.3 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium N3710 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pentium N3710

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,386 vs 1,406).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 16.3 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1020E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3710 better than Celeron 1020E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium N3710 is ahead with a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1020E pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1020E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3710 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium N3710 comes in 87.2% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron 1020E only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 89.9% better value on paper (16.3 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on G2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3710 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 1020E vs Pentium N3710 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1020E

The Celeron 1020E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,406 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium N3710

The Pentium N3710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Braswell (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.56 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,386 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1020E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3710 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3710 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Celeron 1020E versus 2.56 GHz on the Pentium N3710 — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Pentium N3710 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 1020E uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3710 uses Braswell (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1020E scores 1,406 against the Pentium N3710's 1,386 — a 1.4% lead for the Celeron 1020E. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1020E vs 0 kB on the Pentium N3710.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium N3710
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.56 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+38%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Braswell (2015−2016)
PassMark	1,406+1%	1,386

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1020E uses the G2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3710 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium N3710
Socket	G2	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 1020E) / not specified (Pentium N3710). The Celeron 1020E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3710 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1020E targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1020E rivals Pentium 2020M.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium N3710
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 1020E was priced at $86, while the Pentium N3710 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($86 vs $161), Celeron 1020E was $75 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 1020E delivers 16.3 pts/$ vs 8.6 pts/$ for the Pentium N3710 — making the Celeron 1020E the 62% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 1020E	Pentium N3710
MSRP	$86-47%	$161
Performance per Dollar	16.3+90%	8.6
Release Date	2013	2016

Search Celeron 1020E on Amazon

Search Pentium N3710 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.