Celeron 1037U vs V-Series V105

Celeron 1037U vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 1037U

2 / 2

1,034

+0.6%

1,028

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1037U vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1037U vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1037U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,034).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1037U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1037U better than V-Series V105?

Yes. Celeron 1037U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1037U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1037U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1037U still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 1037U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 1037U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1037U vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1037U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 1037U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 40% clock advantage for the Celeron 1037U. The Celeron 1037U is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 1037U scores 1,034 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron 1037U.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+50%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	—
PassMark	1,034	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	324	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	626	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1037U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	V-Series V105
Socket	BGA1023	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Celeron 1037U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500.