Celeron 2950M
VS
A4-5300B

Celeron 2950M vs A4-5300B

Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A4-5300B

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2950M is positioned at rank 545 and the A4-5300B is on rank 781, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5300B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15008%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14181%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10297%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3102%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2457%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2149%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1231%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1215%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1106%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1106%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1094%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1064%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1049%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1045%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1036%
#393
Core i3-9300T
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
99%
#781
A4-5300B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#782
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
100%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
99%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
99%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
99%
#787
FX-6120
MSRP: $188|Avg: $54
99%
#788
Core i7-6700TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $175
99%
#789
Athlon II X4 620
MSRP: $99|Avg: $15
99%
#791
Core i7-3820
MSRP: $286|Avg: $30
97%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
97%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
97%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A4-5300B delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 2950M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron 2950MA4-5300B
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2950MA4-5300B
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2950M and A4-5300B

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

A4-5300B

The A4-5300B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,246 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2950M and A4-5300B share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M versus 3.6 GHz on the A4-5300B — a 57.1% clock advantage for the A4-5300B (base: 2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Celeron 2950M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A4-5300B uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2950M scores 1,238 against the A4-5300B's 1,246 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-5300B. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 352 vs 428, a 19.5% lead for the A4-5300B that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2950M vs 0 kB on the A4-5300B.

FeatureCeleron 2950MA4-5300B
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.6 GHz+80%
Base Clock
2 GHz
3.4 GHz+70%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,238
1,246
Geekbench 6 Single
352
428+22%
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2950M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A4-5300B uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM87,HM86 (Celeron 2950M) and A55,A75,A85X (A4-5300B).

FeatureCeleron 2950MA4-5300B
Socket
PGA946
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 2950M) vs AMD-V (A4-5300B). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2950M) and Radeon HD 7480D (A4-5300B) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2950M targets Budget, A4-5300B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M; A4-5300B rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureCeleron 2950MA4-5300B
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Radeon HD 7480D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Business Desktop