Celeron 2950M
VS
Pentium Dual Core T4300

Celeron 2950M vs Pentium Dual Core T4300

Intel

Celeron 2950M

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2950M is positioned at rank 545 and the Pentium Dual Core T4300 is on rank 1127, so the Celeron 2950M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2950M

#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
97%
#533
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
711%
#534
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
701%
#535
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
643%
#536
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
640%
#537
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
634%
#539
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
613%
#540
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
587%
#541
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
586%
#542
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
571%
#545
Celeron 2950M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#549
Celeron Dual-Core T1500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $49
98%
#557
Pentium P6200
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T4300

#1115
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3574%
#1116
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3521%
#1117
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3233%
#1118
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3218%
#1119
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3189%
#1121
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3079%
#1122
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2952%
#1123
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2948%
#1124
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2868%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
100%
#1128
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
100%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
100%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
100%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
100%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
99%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
95%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
94%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
94%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
93%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium Dual Core T4300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2950M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 2950MPentium Dual Core T4300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 2950MPentium Dual Core T4300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($99)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2950M and Pentium Dual Core T4300

Intel

Celeron 2950M

The Celeron 2950M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,238 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T4300

The Pentium Dual Core T4300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,232 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2950M and Pentium Dual Core T4300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron 2950M versus 2.1 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T4300 — a 4.9% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T4300 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Celeron 2950M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2950M scores 1,238 against the Pentium Dual Core T4300's 1,232 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 2950M. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 2950M vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual Core T4300.

FeatureCeleron 2950MPentium Dual Core T4300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.1 GHz+5%
Base Clock
2 GHz
2.1 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
1,238
1,232
Geekbench 6 Single
352
Geekbench 6 Multi
636
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2950M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Celeron 2950M supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 2950M) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T4300) — the Celeron 2950M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCeleron 2950MPentium Dual Core T4300
Socket
PGA946
P
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 2950M) vs No VT-x (Pentium Dual Core T4300). The Celeron 2950M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium Dual Core T4300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2950M targets Budget, Pentium Dual Core T4300 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 2950M rivals Pentium 2020M.

FeatureCeleron 2950MPentium Dual Core T4300
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
No VT-x
Target Use
Budget
Mobile