
Celeron 2981U

Pentium G630T
Celeron 2981U vs Pentium G630T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 2981U vs Pentium G630T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 2981U vs Pentium G630T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 2981U
2014Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Pentium G630T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 13.1 PassMark/$ ($137 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
Pentium G630T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.1 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($79 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,036).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2981U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G630T better than Celeron 2981U?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 2981U vs Pentium G630T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2981U
The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium G630T
The Pentium G630T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron 2981U and Pentium G630T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U versus 2.3 GHz on the Pentium G630T — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Pentium G630T (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron 2981U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G630T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2981U scores 1,036 against the Pentium G630T's 1,032 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G630T.
| Feature | Celeron 2981U | Pentium G630T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.3 GHz+44% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,036 | 1,032 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 2981U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G630T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 2981U | Pentium G630T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2981U) / not specified (Pentium G630T). The Celeron 2981U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium G630T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.
| Feature | Celeron 2981U | Pentium G630T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 2981U was priced at $137, while the Pentium G630T came in at $79. On launch pricing ($137 vs $79), Pentium G630T was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2981U delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 13.1 pts/$ for the Pentium G630T — making the Pentium G630T the 53.3% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 2981U | Pentium G630T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $137 | $79-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.6 | 13.1+72% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














