Celeron 560
VS
Core i5-12400F

Celeron 560 vs Core i5-12400F

VS
Intel

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron 560 is positioned at rank #1199 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 560

#1187
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
5494%
#1188
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
5414%
#1189
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
4970%
#1190
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
4948%
#1191
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
4902%
#1193
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
4734%
#1194
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
4539%
#1195
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
4532%
#1196
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
4410%
#1199
Celeron 560
MSRP: $89|Avg: $5
100%
#1200
Core i3-2312M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1201
Celeron 857
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
99%
#1202
Celeron 925
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
98%
#1203
Core 2 Duo U7700
MSRP: $262|Avg: $10
96%
#1204
Core 2 Duo E8135
MSRP: $200|Avg: $15
96%
#1205
Core Duo T2400
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
95%
#1206
Core 2 Duo U7600
MSRP: $250|Avg: $5
95%
#1207
Pentium M 735
MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A
93%
#1208
Core i7-620LM
MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A
91%
#1209
Core i7-740QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
91%
#1211
Core 2 Solo SU3300
MSRP: $262|Avg: $50
89%
#1212
Celeron 540
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
89%
#1213
Celeron U3600
MSRP: $134|Avg: $134
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-12400F

#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
121%
#16
Core Ultra 5 225F
MSRP: $231|Avg: $150
118%
#17
Core Ultra 7 265K
MSRP: $309|Avg: $285
116%
#18
Ryzen 9 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $150
115%
#19
Ryzen 5 3600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $90
113%
#20
Core i7-14700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $260
113%
#21
Core i7-14700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $270
109%
#22
Ryzen 5 4500
MSRP: $129|Avg: $85
106%
#23
Ryzen 5 5600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $115
106%
#24
Celeron G5925
MSRP: $62|Avg: $15
105%
#25
Ryzen 5 7500F
MSRP: $179|Avg: $145
104%
#26
Core Ultra 5 245
MSRP: $319|Avg: $220
103%
#27
Ryzen 7 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $86
102%
#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
102%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
100%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
100%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
99%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
98%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
98%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
98%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
95%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
93%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
92%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
91%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
91%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
91%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
91%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
90%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
90%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
90%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-12400F (2022) utilizes Intel 7 nm technology and DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake-S (2022) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 560 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+87%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($5)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 560 and Core i5-12400F

Intel

Celeron 560

The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F is built on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Core i5-12400F's 19,532 — a 190.5% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 560 vs 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F.

FeatureCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.5 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
1 MB L2 Cache
18 MB (total)+1700%
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)
Process
65 nm
Intel 7 nm-89%
Architecture
Alder Lake-S (2022)
PassMark
475
19,532+4012%
Cinebench R23 Multi
12,380
Geekbench 6 Single
1,700
Geekbench 6 Multi
657
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-12400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-667 on the Celeron 560 versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F — the Core i5-12400F supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 560) vs 20 (Core i5-12400F) — the Core i5-12400F offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Santa Rosa (Celeron 560) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F).

FeatureCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
Socket
PGA478
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-667
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+150%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: No (Celeron 560) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget, Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310; Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.

FeatureCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Gaming Performance/Value
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 560 launched at $89 MSRP, while the Core i5-12400F debuted at $174. At current prices ($5 vs $110), the Celeron 560 is $105 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 560 delivers 95.0 pts/$ vs 177.6 pts/$ for the Core i5-12400F — making the Core i5-12400F the 60.6% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 560Core i5-12400F
MSRP
$89-49%
$174
Avg Price (30d)
$5-95%
$110
Performance per Dollar
95.0
177.6+87%
Release Date
2008
2022