Celeron 560
Mobile Sempron M100
Celeron 560 vs Mobile Sempron M100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 560 vs Mobile Sempron M100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 560 vs Mobile Sempron M100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 560
2008Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 31W instead of 512W, a 481W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $89 MSRP, while Mobile Sempron M100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Mobile Sempron M100
2009Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron 560 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (448 vs 475).
- ❌1551.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 31W.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron 560 better than Mobile Sempron M100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 560 vs Mobile Sempron M100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 560
The Celeron 560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.13 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 475 points. Launch price was $69.
Mobile Sempron M100
The Mobile Sempron M100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: S. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Mobile Sempron M100 is built on the Caspian (2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 560 scores 475 against the Mobile Sempron M100's 448 — a 5.9% lead for the Celeron 560.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Mobile Sempron M100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.13 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | — |
| L2 Cache | — | 512 kB |
| Process | 65 nm | 40 nm-38% |
| Architecture | — | Caspian (2009) |
| PassMark | 475+6% | 448 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 560 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Sempron M100 uses S (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Mobile Sempron M100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | S |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-667 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 560) / not specified (Mobile Sempron M100). Primary use case: Celeron 560 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 560 rivals Pentium T2310.
| Feature | Celeron 560 | Mobile Sempron M100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 560 and Mobile Sempron M100
