Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Intel

Celeron 6305

2 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019
Ryzen family
·······

Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 6305

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $92 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics for 11th Gen, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,236 vs 1,898).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.4 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +318.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
  • Delivers 357.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 19.4 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).
  • 500% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron 6305.

Trade-offs

  • 86% HIGHER MSRP
    $199 MSRPvs$107 MSRP
  • 2500% higher power demand at 65W vs 2.5W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron 6305 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron 6305?
Yes. Ryzen 5 3600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 318.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 53.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and 751.5% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 3600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 318.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 3600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 53.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in 86.0% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you a 318.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 357.8% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 19.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 6305 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 6305 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

Processing Power

The Celeron 6305 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 80% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600. The Celeron 6305 uses the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 6305 scores 2,077 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 158% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 744 vs 1,295, a 54% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,236 vs 1,898 (42.2% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Celeron 6305 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureCeleron 6305Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
4.2 GHz+133%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB
32 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB
512K (per core)+20380%
Process
10 nm SuperFin
7 nm, 12 nm-30%
Architecture
Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
2,077
17,685+751%
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,500
Geekbench 6 Single
744
1,295+74%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,236
1,898+54%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 6305 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron 6305) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

FeatureCeleron 6305Ryzen 5 3600
Socket
FCBGA1449
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
128 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
4
24+500%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron 6305 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics for 11th Gen), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

FeatureCeleron 6305Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics for 11th Gen
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Budget
Gaming/Budget Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 6305 was priced at $107, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($107 vs $199), Celeron 6305 was $92 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 6305 delivers 19.4 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 128.3% better value option.

FeatureCeleron 6305Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP
$107-46%
$199
Performance per Dollar
19.4
88.9+358%
Release Date
2020
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.