Celeron 925 vs Celeron 807

CPU

GPU

Celeron 925

35 WW2011

Celeron 807

1 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron 925

525

0.0%

535

+1.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 925 is positioned at rank 1202 and the Celeron 807 is on rank 1141, so the Celeron 807 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 925

#1190

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

5589%

#1191

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

5507%

#1192

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

5055%

#1193

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

5032%

#1194

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

4986%

#1196

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

4815%

#1197

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

4617%

#1198

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

4610%

#1199

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

4486%

#1202

Celeron 925

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#1203

Core 2 Duo E8135

MSRP: $200|Avg: $15

97%

#1204

Core 2 Duo U7700

MSRP: $262|Avg: $10

97%

#1205

Core Duo T2400

MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A

96%

#1206

Core 2 Duo U7600

MSRP: $250|Avg: $5

96%

#1207

Pentium M 735

MSRP: $294|Avg: N/A

94%

#1208

Core i7-620LM

MSRP: $300|Avg: N/A

93%

#1209

Core i7-740QM

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

93%

#1211

Core 2 Solo SU3300

MSRP: $262|Avg: $50

91%

#1212

Celeron 540

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

90%

#1213

Celeron U3600

MSRP: $134|Avg: $134

89%

#1216

Core 2 Quad Q9000

MSRP: $348|Avg: $15

87%

#1217

Core i5-2537M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 807

#1129

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3840%

#1130

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3784%

#1131

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3474%

#1132

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3458%

#1133

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3426%

#1135

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3309%

#1136

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3173%

#1137

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3168%

#1138

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3082%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

100%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

100%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

100%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

99%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

99%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

99%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

98%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

98%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

97%

#1152

Core 2 Duo E8435

MSRP: $150|Avg: $74

96%

#1153

Celeron M 723

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1154

Core i7-3517UE

MSRP: $330|Avg: $35

95%

#1155

Core M-5Y51

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

95%

#1156

Pentium N3530

MSRP: $161|Avg: $20

94%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron 807 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron 925 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.9% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron 925	Celeron 807
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)	✅ More affordable ($10)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron 807 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($10 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron 925	Celeron 807
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+919%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($100)	✅ More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron 925 Benchmark Check

Celeron 807 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 925 and Celeron 807

Celeron 925

The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron 807

The Celeron 807 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 535 points. Launch price was $70.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 807 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 925 scores 525 against the Celeron 807's 535 — a 1.9% lead for the Celeron 807. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron 807.

Feature	Celeron 925	Celeron 807
Cores / Threads	—	1 / 2
Boost Clock	—	1.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+53%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	1 MB L2 Cache	1.5 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	—	256K (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	—	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	525	535+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron 807 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 925) vs 2 (Celeron 807). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925) and QM67,QS67,HM67,HM65 (Celeron 807).

Feature	Celeron 925	Celeron 807
Socket	—	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	16 GB+300%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron 925) vs VT-x (Celeron 807). The Celeron 807 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron 925 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 925 targets Budget, Celeron 807 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

Feature	Celeron 925	Celeron 807
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 925 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron 807 debuted at $70. At current prices ($100 vs $10), the Celeron 807 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 925 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 53.5 pts/$ for the Celeron 807 — making the Celeron 807 the 164.3% better value option.