Celeron 925
Ryzen 7 3700X
Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 925
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (525 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +1805.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+3100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅Delivers 1198.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 5.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌229% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron 925?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 925 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Celeron 925
The Celeron 925 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 525 points. Launch price was $69.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 925 scores 525 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 190.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron 925 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | — | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | — | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+57% |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 32 MB+3100% |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% |
| Architecture | — | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 525 | 22,430+4172% |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron 925 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Celeron 925) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron 925) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GL40,GM45 (Celeron 925) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | — | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 4.0+100% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 128 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: No (Celeron 925) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). Primary use case: Celeron 925 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 925 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | No | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron 925 was priced at $100, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($100 vs $329), Celeron 925 was $229 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 925 delivers 5.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 171.4% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron 925 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-70% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 68.2+1187% |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron 925 and Ryzen 7 3700X
