
Celeron B720 vs Celeron 1047UE

Celeron B720

Celeron 1047UE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B720 is positioned at rank 1091 and the Celeron 1047UE is on rank 1170, so the Celeron B720 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B720
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+885%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B720 and Celeron 1047UE

Celeron B720
The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron 1047UE
The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.
Processing Power
The Celeron B720 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 1047UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Celeron B720. The Celeron B720 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B720 scores 665 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.
| Feature | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.7 GHz+21% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.7 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB (total) | 2 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| PassMark | 665 | 675+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 159 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 293 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron B720 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B720) and BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE).
| Feature | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | G2 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B720) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron B720 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Celeron 1047UE debuted at $100. At current prices ($10 vs $100), the Celeron B720 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B720 delivers 66.5 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 1047UE — making the Celeron B720 the 163.1% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron B720 | Celeron 1047UE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-30% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-90% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.5+878% | 6.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











