Celeron B720
VS
Celeron 1047UE

Celeron B720 vs Celeron 1047UE

Intel

Celeron B720

1 Cores1 Thrd0 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron 1047UE

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron B720 is positioned at rank 1091 and the Celeron 1047UE is on rank 1170, so the Celeron B720 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B720

#1078
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3088%
#1079
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3043%
#1080
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2794%
#1081
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2781%
#1082
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2756%
#1084
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2661%
#1085
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2552%
#1086
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2547%
#1087
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2479%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
100%
#1092
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1093
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1095
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1097
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1098
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1099
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1100
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1103
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
95%
#1104
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1047UE

#1158
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4347%
#1159
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4283%
#1160
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3932%
#1161
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3914%
#1162
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3878%
#1164
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3745%
#1165
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3591%
#1166
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3585%
#1167
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3489%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron B720 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1047UE is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron B720 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 90% cheaper ($10 vs $100) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+885%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($100)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B720 and Celeron 1047UE

Intel

Celeron B720

The Celeron B720 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron 1047UE

The Celeron 1047UE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 675 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The Celeron B720 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron 1047UE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron 1047UE has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B720 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 1047UE — a 19.4% clock advantage for the Celeron B720. The Celeron B720 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 1047UE uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B720 scores 665 against the Celeron 1047UE's 675 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron 1047UE. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B720 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1047UE.

FeatureCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz+21%
1.4 GHz
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB (total)
2 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
665
675+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
159
Geekbench 6 Multi
293
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B720 uses the G2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 1047UE uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B720) and BGA1023 (Celeron 1047UE).

FeatureCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
Socket
G2
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B720) and Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1047UE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B720 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B720 rivals Pentium 967.

FeatureCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B720 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Celeron 1047UE debuted at $100. At current prices ($10 vs $100), the Celeron B720 is $90 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B720 delivers 66.5 pts/$ vs 6.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 1047UE — making the Celeron B720 the 163.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B720Celeron 1047UE
MSRP
$70-30%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$10-90%
$100
Performance per Dollar
66.5+878%
6.8
Release Date
2012
2013