PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron B800 vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron B800 vs Pentium Dual Core T2410: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron B800

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 25.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 19.0 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium Dual Core T2410 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Pentium Dual Core T2410

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,896 vs 1,910).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.0 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron B800 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron B800 better than Pentium Dual Core T2410?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium Dual Core T2410 is ahead with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B800 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron B800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron B800 is the better buy right now. Celeron B800 comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium Dual Core T2410 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.3% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 25.9% better value on MSRP (23.9 vs 19.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron B800 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron B800 vs Pentium Dual Core T2410 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron B800

The Celeron B800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,910 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium Dual Core T2410

The Pentium Dual Core T2410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: P. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,896 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron B800 and Pentium Dual Core T2410 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron B800 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Pentium Dual Core T2410. The Celeron B800 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B800 scores 1,910 against the Pentium Dual Core T2410's 1,896 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B800.

Feature	Celeron B800	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+25500%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,910	1,896

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B800 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 uses P (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B800 versus 667 on the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — the Celeron B800 supports 99.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron B800 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B800) and Socket P (Pentium Dual Core T2410).

Feature	Celeron B800	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Socket	PGA988	P
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+100%	667
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B800) vs false (Pentium Dual Core T2410). The Celeron B800 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B800 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B800 rivals Pentium 967.

Feature	Celeron B800	Pentium Dual Core T2410
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	false
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron B800 was priced at $80, while the Pentium Dual Core T2410 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($80 vs $100), Celeron B800 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B800 delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 19.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T2410 — making the Celeron B800 the 22.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron B800	Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP	$80-20%	$100
Performance per Dollar	23.9+26%	19.0
Release Date	2011	2008

Search Celeron B800 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T2410 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.