Celeron B820
VS
Core i7-12700K

Celeron B820 vs Core i7-12700K

Intel

Celeron B820

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-12700K

12 Cores20 Thrd125 WWMax: 5 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Celeron B820 is positioned at rank #1109 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron B820

#1097
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3297%
#1098
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3248%
#1099
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2982%
#1100
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2969%
#1101
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2941%
#1103
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2840%
#1104
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2724%
#1105
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2719%
#1106
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2646%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
100%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
99%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
98%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
97%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
97%
#1116
Core m3-7Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1117
Pentium 977
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1118
Core i7-2715QE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $50
96%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
96%
#1121
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
94%
#1123
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-12700K

#113
Core i7-14700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $330
104%
#114
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP: $89|Avg: $52
104%
#115
Core i9-14900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $469
104%
#116
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
103%
#117
Core i7-13790F
MSRP: $392|Avg: $350
103%
#118
Core i5-14500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $251
103%
#119
Core i5-11600KF
MSRP: $237|Avg: $157
103%
#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
103%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
102%
#123
Ryzen 5 5600G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
102%
#124
Core Ultra 9 285K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
102%
#125
Core i5-13400E
MSRP: $221|Avg: $221
101%
#126
Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP: $270|Avg: $257
101%
#127
Core i9-14900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $480
101%
#128
Core i7-12700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $285
100%
#129
Core i9-13900KF
MSRP: $599|Avg: $480
100%
#130
Core i7-12700
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
100%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
99%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
98%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
98%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
98%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
98%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
98%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
98%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
97%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
97%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
97%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
96%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-12700K (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($285)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron B820 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+136%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($285)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron B820 and Core i7-12700K

Intel

Celeron B820

The Celeron B820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 765 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Core i7-12700K

The Core i7-12700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 November 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,347 points. Launch price was $409.

Processing Power

The Celeron B820 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core i7-12700K offers 12 cores / 20 threads — the Core i7-12700K has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Celeron B820 versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-12700K — a 98.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-12700K (base: 1.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron B820 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-12700K uses Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron B820 scores 765 against the Core i7-12700K's 34,347 — a 191.3% lead for the Core i7-12700K. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron B820 vs 25 MB (total) on the Core i7-12700K.

FeatureCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
12 / 20+500%
Boost Clock
1.7 GHz
5 GHz+194%
Base Clock
1.7 GHz
3.6 GHz+112%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
25 MB (total)+1150%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process
32 nm
10 nm-69%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Alder Lake, Golden Cove, Gracemont (2021)
PassMark
765
34,347+4390%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron B820 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-12700K uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron B820 versus 4800 on the Core i7-12700K — the Core i7-12700K supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-12700K supports up to 128 of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron B820) vs 20 (Core i7-12700K) — the Core i7-12700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QM77 (Celeron B820) and Z690,B660 (Core i7-12700K).

FeatureCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
Socket
PGA988
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
4800+159900%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+13107100%
128
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
20+25%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron B820) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-12700K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron B820) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-12700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron B820 rivals Pentium 967; Core i7-12700K rivals Ryzen 7 5800X.

FeatureCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Intel UHD Graphics 770
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron B820 launched at $86 MSRP, while the Core i7-12700K debuted at $409. At current prices ($15 vs $285), the Celeron B820 is $270 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron B820 delivers 51.0 pts/$ vs 120.5 pts/$ for the Core i7-12700K — making the Core i7-12700K the 81.1% better value option.

FeatureCeleron B820Core i7-12700K
MSRP
$86-79%
$409
Avg Price (30d)
$15-95%
$285
Performance per Dollar
51.0
120.5+136%
Release Date
2012
2021