Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
VS
Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

2 Cores2 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is positioned at rank 1098 and the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is on rank 1101, so the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#1086
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3145%
#1087
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3099%
#1088
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2845%
#1089
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2832%
#1090
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2806%
#1092
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2710%
#1093
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2598%
#1094
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2594%
#1095
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2524%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
100%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
99%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
97%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
96%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
95%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
94%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
94%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
94%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4200+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
144313%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
136361%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
99009%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
29827%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
23626%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
20669%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11838%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11683%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10638%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10637%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
10518%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
10234%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
10091%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
10050%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9959%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
100%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
97%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
91%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
89%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
86%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
85%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
83%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
78%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
73%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
68%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
67%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
65%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
58%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
58%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
58%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
57%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Manchester (2005−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $50 (vs $110), it costs 55% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 119% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Athlon 64 X2 4200+.
InsightCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+119%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($50)
⚠️ Higher cost ($110)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+

Intel

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

AMD

Athlon 64 X2 4200+

The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Dezembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Manchester (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,255 points. Launch price was $309.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon 64 X2 4200+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 2.2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses Manchester (2005−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Athlon 64 X2 4200+'s 1,255 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
2.2 GHz+83%
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Manchester (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,250
1,255
Geekbench 6 Single
150
Geekbench 6 Multi
280
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ uses 939 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon 64 X2 4200+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+) — the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 4200+).

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Socket
BGA956
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-800+50%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
16 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 4200+). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Mobile
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 launched at $134 MSRP, while the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ debuted at $581. At current prices ($50 vs $110), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is $60 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 25.0 pts/$ vs 11.4 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 4200+ — making the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 the 74.7% better value option.

FeatureCeleron Dual-Core SU2300Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP
$134-77%
$581
Avg Price (30d)
$50-55%
$110
Performance per Dollar
25.0+119%
11.4
Release Date
2009
2006