Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Z-60

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Z-60 Performance Spectrum

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 / 2

1,250

+0.1%

1,249

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Z-60 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Z-60: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 5W, a 4W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while Z-60 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Z-60 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Z-60

2012

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6250, while Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,249 vs 1,250).
❌400% higher power demand at 5W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than Z-60?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better buy right now. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Z-60 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Z-60 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Z-60

The Z-60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Hondo (2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 1,249 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Z-60 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 1 GHz on the Z-60 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Z-60 uses Hondo (2012) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Z-60's 1,249 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Z-60
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz+20%	1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Hondo (2012)
PassMark	1,250	1,249
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	658
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	280	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Z-60 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus DDR3-1066 on the Z-60 — the Z-60 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs 1 (Z-60).

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Z-60
Socket	BGA956	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) vs AMD-V (Z-60). The Z-60 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6250), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile, Z-60 targets Tablet. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100; Z-60 rivals Core i3-2310M.