A4-1250 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

CPU

GPU

A4-1250

2 Cores2 Thrd8 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2009

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A4-1250 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Performance Spectrum

A4-1250

2 / 2

1,258

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2 / 2

1,250

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-1250 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-1250 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-1250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8210, while Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (111 vs 150).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (188 vs 280).
❌700% higher power demand at 8W vs 1W.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅+35.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 1W instead of 8W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-1250 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 better than A4-1250?

Yes. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 48.9% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 48.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 comes in 34.0% more expensive on MSRP at $134 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. A4-1250 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-1250 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-1250 vs Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-1250

The A4-1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,258 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-1250 and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the A4-1250 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. The A4-1250 uses the Temash (2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-1250 scores 1,258 against the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300's 1,250 — a 0.6% lead for the A4-1250. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 111 vs 150, a 29.9% lead for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 188 vs 280 (39.3% advantage for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300).

Feature	A4-1250	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1 GHz	1.2 GHz+20%
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,258	1,250
Geekbench 6 Single	111	150+35%
Geekbench 6 Multi	188	280+49%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-1250 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L 1333 MHz on the A4-1250 versus DDR3-800 on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — the A4-1250 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-1250 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-1250) vs 2 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-1250) vs 6 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) — the A4-1250 offers 2 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FT3 (A4-1250) and GS45 (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300).

Feature	A4-1250	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Socket	FT3	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L 1333 MHz+67%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8+33%	6

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A4-1250) vs VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300). The A4-1250 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8210), while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-1250 targets Tablet, Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: A4-1250 rivals Atom Z3740; Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

Feature	A4-1250	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8210	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x
Target Use	Tablet	Legacy Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A4-1250 was priced at $100, while the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($100 vs $134), A4-1250 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A4-1250 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 9.3 pts/$ for the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 — making the A4-1250 the 29.7% better value option.

Feature	A4-1250	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP	$100-25%	$134
Performance per Dollar	12.6+35%	9.3
Release Date	2013	2009

Search A4-1250 on Amazon

Search Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.