Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium J2900

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium J2900 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium J2900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,250 vs 1,254).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 13.3 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $94 MSRP).

Pentium J2900

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($94 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.3 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($94 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium J2900 better than Celeron Dual-Core SU2300?

Yes. Pentium J2900 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium J2900 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium J2900 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium J2900 is the better buy right now. Pentium J2900 comes in $40 cheaper on MSRP at $94 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 43.0% better value on MSRP (13.3 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium J2900 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium J2900 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium J2900

The Pentium J2900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,254 points. Launch price was $94.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium J2900 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium J2900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 2.66 GHz on the Pentium J2900 — a 75.6% clock advantage for the Pentium J2900. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium J2900 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Pentium J2900's 1,254 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium J2900.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium J2900
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.66 GHz+122%
Base Clock	—	2.41 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,250	1,254
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	280	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium J2900 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium J2900
Socket	BGA956	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) / not specified (Pentium J2900). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium J2900
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Legacy Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Pentium J2900 came in at $94. On launch pricing ($134 vs $94), Pentium J2900 was $40 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 13.3 pts/$ for the Pentium J2900 — making the Pentium J2900 the 35.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium J2900
MSRP	$134	$94-30%
Performance per Dollar	9.3	13.3+43%
Release Date	2009	2013

Search Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on Amazon

Search Pentium J2900 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.