Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium G6950

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium G6950 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium G6950: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 73W, a 72W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (6 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,250 vs 1,252).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $87 MSRP).

Pentium G6950

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($87 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
✅Delivers 54.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 9.3 PassMark/$ ($87 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌7200% higher power demand at 73W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G6950 better than Celeron Dual-Core SU2300?

Yes. Pentium G6950 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.2% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G6950 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G6950 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G6950 is the better buy right now. Pentium G6950 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $87 MSRP versus $134 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 54.3% better value on MSRP (14.4 vs 9.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G6950 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs Pentium G6950 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,250 points. Launch price was $134.

Pentium G6950

The Pentium G6950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,252 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Pentium G6950 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium G6950 — a 80% clock advantage for the Pentium G6950. The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium G6950 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 scores 1,250 against the Pentium G6950's 1,252 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium G6950.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium G6950
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.8 GHz+133%
Base Clock	—	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,250	1,252
Geekbench 6 Single	150	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	280	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium G6950 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium G6950
Socket	BGA956	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	6	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron Dual-Core SU2300) / not specified (Pentium G6950). Primary use case: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 targets Legacy Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 rivals Pentium SU4100.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium G6950
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Legacy Mobile	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 was priced at $134, while the Pentium G6950 came in at $87. On launch pricing ($134 vs $87), Pentium G6950 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 delivers 9.3 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Pentium G6950 — making the Pentium G6950 the 42.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron Dual-Core SU2300	Pentium G6950
MSRP	$134	$87-35%
Performance per Dollar	9.3	14.4+55%
Release Date	2009	2010

Search Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on Amazon

Search Pentium G6950 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.