Celeron E1200 vs Pentium T2310

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium T2310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium T2310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E1200

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $97 less on MSRP ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 201.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.5 vs 4.2 PassMark/$ ($53 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Pentium T2310

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron E1200 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (625 vs 665).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 12.5 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $53 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron E1200 better than Pentium T2310?

Yes. Celeron E1200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 6.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron E1200 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron E1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 6.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron E1200 is the better buy right now. Celeron E1200 comes in $97 cheaper on MSRP at $53 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 201.1% better value on MSRP (12.5 vs 4.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron E1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2007). That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E1200 vs Pentium T2310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E1200

The Celeron E1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 665 points. Launch price was $40.

Pentium T2310

The Pentium T2310 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 1.46 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 625 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron E1200 is built on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron E1200 scores 665 against the Pentium T2310's 625 — a 6.2% lead for the Celeron E1200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E1200 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T2310.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium T2310
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+10%	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB (total)	—
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Allendale (2006−2009)	—
PassMark	665+6%	625
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E1200 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T2310 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron E1200 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium T2310 — the Celeron E1200 supports 19.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E1200 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium T2310
Socket	LGA775	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800+20%	DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: No (Celeron E1200) vs VT-x is missing (Pentium T2310). Primary use case: Celeron E1200 targets Budget, Pentium T2310 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron E1200 rivals Pentium E2140.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium T2310
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	No	VT-x is missing
Target Use	Budget	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron E1200 was priced at $53, while the Pentium T2310 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($53 vs $150), Celeron E1200 was $97 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron E1200 delivers 12.5 pts/$ vs 4.2 pts/$ for the Pentium T2310 — making the Celeron E1200 the 100.3% better value option.

Feature	Celeron E1200	Pentium T2310
MSRP	$53-65%	$150
Performance per Dollar	12.5+198%	4.2
Release Date	2008	2007

Search Celeron E1200 on Amazon

Search Pentium T2310 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.