PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron E3500 vs Core i3-2350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron E3500 vs Core i3-2350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron E3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (347 vs 390).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (624 vs 806).
❌Launch MSRP is still $62 MSRP, while Core i3-2350M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-2350M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-2350M

2011

Why buy it

✅+12.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Celeron E3500 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-2350M better than Celeron E3500?

Yes. Core i3-2350M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 29.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-2350M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-2350M is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-2350M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-2350M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $62 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron E3500 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (20.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-2350M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron E3500 vs Core i3-2350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron E3500

The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.

Core i3-2350M

The Core i3-2350M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,276 points. Launch price was $225.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron E3500 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2350M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i3-2350M — a 16% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Celeron E3500 uses the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-2350M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron E3500 scores 1,290 against the Core i3-2350M's 1,276 — a 1.1% lead for the Celeron E3500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 347 vs 390, a 11.7% lead for the Core i3-2350M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 624 vs 806 (25.5% advantage for the Core i3-2350M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron E3500 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2350M.

Feature	Celeron E3500	Core i3-2350M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Wolfdale (2008−2010)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,290+1%	1,276
Geekbench 6 Single	347	390+12%
Geekbench 6 Multi	624	806+29%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron E3500 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-2350M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron E3500 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i3-2350M — the Core i3-2350M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-2350M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron E3500) vs 16 (Core i3-2350M) — the Core i3-2350M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500) and HM65,HM67,QM67 (Core i3-2350M).

Feature	Celeron E3500	Core i3-2350M
Socket	LGA775	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Core i3-2350M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron E3500 targets Budget, Core i3-2350M targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.