
Celeron G1620

Pentium G870
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G870 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G870 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Dead by Daylight

Deadlock
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G870: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1620
2012Why buy it
- ✅+1.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $34 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 30.5 vs 18.2 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
Pentium G870
2012Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,562 vs 1,586).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 18.2 vs 30.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1620.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1620 better than Pentium G870?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G870 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620
The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Pentium G870
The Pentium G870 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,562 points. Launch price was $97.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G1620 and Pentium G870 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1620 versus 3.1 GHz on the Pentium G870 — a 13.8% clock advantage for the Pentium G870 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Celeron G1620 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium G870 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620 scores 1,586 against the Pentium G870's 1,562 — a 1.5% lead for the Celeron G1620. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G870.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,586+2% | 1,562 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 441 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 760 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G870 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620) / not specified (Pentium G870). The Celeron G1620 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)), while the Pentium G870 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G870 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1620 was priced at $52, while the Pentium G870 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($52 vs $86), Celeron G1620 was $34 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1620 delivers 30.5 pts/$ vs 18.2 pts/$ for the Pentium G870 — making the Celeron G1620 the 50.7% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-40% | $86 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.5+68% | 18.2 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














