Celeron G1620T
VS
Core Duo T2250

Celeron G1620T vs Core Duo T2250

Intel

Celeron G1620T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1620T is positioned at rank 533 and the Core Duo T2250 is on rank 3, so the Core Duo T2250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1620T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8545%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
8074%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5862%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1766%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1399%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1224%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
701%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
692%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
630%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
630%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
623%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
606%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
598%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
595%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
590%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
98%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
95%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
94%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
100%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
100%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
98%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
96%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
96%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
96%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
95%
#548
Core i3-6100
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2250

#3
Core Duo T2250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
95%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
94%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
86%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
86%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
85%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
82%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
79%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
79%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
77%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
71%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1620T (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1620TCore Duo T2250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2250 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1620TCore Duo T2250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1620T and Core Duo T2250

Intel

Celeron G1620T

The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

Intel

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1620T and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G1620T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2250. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620T vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250.

FeatureCeleron G1620TCore Duo T2250
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+41%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+39%
1.73 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,532
1,537
Geekbench 6 Single
374
Geekbench 6 Multi
701
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1620TCore Duo T2250
Socket
LGA1155
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.

FeatureCeleron G1620TCore Duo T2250
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget