Celeron G1620T vs Core Duo T2250

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1620T vs Core Duo T2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1620T vs Core Duo T2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1620T

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core Duo T2250 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,532 vs 1,537).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core Duo T2250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1620T better than Core Duo T2250?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1620T is ahead with a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1620T is the better buy right now. Celeron G1620T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core Duo T2250 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1620T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1620T vs Core Duo T2250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620T

The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1620T and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 34.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G1620T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2250. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620T vs 0 kB on the Core Duo T2250.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+41%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+39%	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,532	1,537
Geekbench 6 Single	374	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	701	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Core Duo T2250
Socket	LGA1155	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.