Celeron G1620T vs Core i5-4210Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1620T vs Core i5-4210Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1620T vs Core i5-4210Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1620T

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (374 vs 580).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-4210Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4210Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+55.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,530 vs 1,532).
❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1620T better than Core i5-4210Y?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-4210Y is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1620T pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark. Core i5-4210Y also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1620T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1620T is the better buy right now. Celeron G1620T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i5-4210Y is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (36.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4210Y is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron G1620T vs Core i5-4210Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620T

The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-4210Y

The Core i5-4210Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,530 points. Launch price was $297.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1620T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4210Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i5-4210Y — a 23.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1620T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4210Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Core i5-4210Y's 1,530 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1620T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 374 vs 580, a 43.2% lead for the Core i5-4210Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620T vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4210Y.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Core i5-4210Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+26%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+60%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,532	1,530
Geekbench 6 Single	374	580+55%
Geekbench 6 Multi	701	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4210Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i5-4210Y — the Core i5-4210Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1620T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1620T) vs 12 (Core i5-4210Y) — the Celeron G1620T offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1620T) and HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4210Y).

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Core i5-4210Y
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) vs VT-x, EPT (Core i5-4210Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1620T) and HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4210Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget, Core i5-4210Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T; Core i5-4210Y rivals A4-6210.