
Celeron G1620T

Core i3-2100T
Celeron G1620T vs Core i3-2100T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1620T vs Core i3-2100T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1620T vs Core i3-2100T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1620T
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 202.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.5 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $127 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Core i3-2100T needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
Core i3-2100T
2011Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,531 vs 1,532).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 36.5 PassMark/$ ($127 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G1620T better than Core i3-2100T?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1620T vs Core i3-2100T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620T
The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i3-2100T
The Core i3-2100T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,531 points. Launch price was $180.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1620T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-2100T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i3-2100T — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-2100T (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-2100T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Core i3-2100T's 1,531 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G1620T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620T vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-2100T.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Core i3-2100T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.5 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,532 | 1,531 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 374 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 701 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Core i3-2100T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) / not specified (Core i3-2100T). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Core i3-2100T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Core i3-2100T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1620T was priced at $42, while the Core i3-2100T came in at $127. On launch pricing ($42 vs $127), Celeron G1620T was $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1620T delivers 36.5 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Core i3-2100T — making the Celeron G1620T the 100.6% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Core i3-2100T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-67% | $127 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.5+202% | 12.1 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














