Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B

CPU

GPU

Celeron G1620T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

Phenom X4 9750B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2008

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1620T

2 / 2

1,532

+0.8%

1,520

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1620T

2013

Why buy it

✅+24.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $173 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Delivers 415.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 36.5 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $215 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Phenom X4 9750B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (701 vs 1,000).

Phenom X4 9750B

2008

Why buy it

✅+42.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 374).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 36.5 PassMark/$ ($215 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1620T better than Phenom X4 9750B?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G1620T is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9750B pulls ahead with 42.7% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9750B is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1620T is the better buy right now. Celeron G1620T comes in $173 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $215 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Phenom X4 9750B is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 42.7% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 415.9% better value on MSRP (36.5 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1620T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620T

The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.

Phenom X4 9750B

The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1620T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G1620T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 374 vs 300, a 22% lead for the Celeron G1620T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 701 vs 1,000 (35.2% advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Phenom X4 9750B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark	1,532	1,520
Geekbench 6 Single	374+25%	300
Geekbench 6 Multi	701	1,000+43%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620T versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Celeron G1620T supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1620T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1620T) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Phenom X4 9750B
Socket	LGA1155	AM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	DDR2-1066
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Phenom X4 9750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget, Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Phenom X4 9750B
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	AMD-V
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G1620T was priced at $42, while the Phenom X4 9750B came in at $215. On launch pricing ($42 vs $215), Celeron G1620T was $173 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1620T delivers 36.5 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9750B — making the Celeron G1620T the 135.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G1620T	Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP	$42-80%	$215
Performance per Dollar	36.5+414%	7.1
Release Date	2013	2008

Search Celeron G1620T on Amazon

Search Phenom X4 9750B on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.