Celeron G1620T vs Phenom X4 9750B
Celeron G1620T
Phenom X4 9750B
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1620T is positioned at rank 533 and the Phenom X4 9750B is on rank 1047, so the Celeron G1620T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1620T
Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9750B
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+128%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($34) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1620T and Phenom X4 9750B
Celeron G1620T
The Celeron G1620T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $42.
Phenom X4 9750B
The Phenom X4 9750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,520 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1620T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1620T versus 2.4 GHz on the Phenom X4 9750B — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron G1620T uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620T scores 1,532 against the Phenom X4 9750B's 1,520 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G1620T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 374 vs 300, a 22% lead for the Celeron G1620T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 701 vs 1,000 (35.2% advantage for the Phenom X4 9750B). Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,532 | 1,520 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 374+25% | 300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 701 | 1,000+43% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1620T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom X4 9750B uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620T versus DDR2-1066 on the Phenom X4 9750B — the Celeron G1620T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1620T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1620T) and AM2+,AM2 (Phenom X4 9750B).
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | AM2+ |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1620T) vs AMD-V (Phenom X4 9750B). The Celeron G1620T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Phenom X4 9750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620T targets Budget, Phenom X4 9750B targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620T rivals Pentium G2020T.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G1620T launched at $42 MSRP, while the Phenom X4 9750B debuted at $215. At current prices ($15 vs $34), the Celeron G1620T is $19 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1620T delivers 102.1 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Phenom X4 9750B — making the Celeron G1620T the 78.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1620T | Phenom X4 9750B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $42-80% | $215 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-56% | $34 |
| Performance per Dollar | 102.1+128% | 44.7 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G1620T and Phenom X4 9750B
