Celeron G1820 vs PRO A6-9500E

Celeron G1820 vs PRO A6-9500E Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1820

2 / 2

1,696

+0.4%

1,689

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1820 vs PRO A6-9500E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1820 vs PRO A6-9500E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1820

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while PRO A6-9500E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $110 MSRP, while PRO A6-9500E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌54.3% higher power demand at 54W vs 35W.

PRO A6-9500E

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 54W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,689 vs 1,696).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1820 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A6-9500E better than Celeron G1820?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-9500E is ahead with a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A6-9500E is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A6-9500E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $110 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1820 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (15.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-9500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G1820 vs PRO A6-9500E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1820

The Celeron G1820 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,696 points. Launch price was $110.

PRO A6-9500E

The PRO A6-9500E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,689 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820 and PRO A6-9500E share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1820 versus 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-9500E — a 23% clock advantage for the PRO A6-9500E (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Celeron G1820 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A6-9500E uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820 scores 1,696 against the PRO A6-9500E's 1,689 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1820.

Feature	Celeron G1820	PRO A6-9500E
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3.4 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	2 MB	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,696	1,689
Geekbench 6 Single	496	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	910	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A6-9500E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1820	PRO A6-9500E
Socket	LGA1150	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820) / not specified (PRO A6-9500E). The Celeron G1820 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the PRO A6-9500E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820 rivals Pentium G3220.