Celeron G1820T
VS
Athlon II X3 425

Celeron G1820T vs Athlon II X3 425

Intel

Celeron G1820T

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon II X3 425

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1820T is positioned at rank 500 and the Athlon II X3 425 is on rank 792, so the Celeron G1820T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7797%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5349%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1611%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1276%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1117%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
640%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
631%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
575%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
575%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
568%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
553%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
545%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
543%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
538%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
98%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
98%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
96%
#500
Celeron G1820T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
97%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X3 425

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
15439%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
14588%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10592%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3191%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2528%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2211%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1266%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1250%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1138%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1138%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1125%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1095%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1080%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1075%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1065%
#294
Core i9-7920X
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $236
97%
#394
Ryzen 3 2200GE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#792
Athlon II X3 425
MSRP: $79|Avg: $5
100%
#793
Athlon II X2 255
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
100%
#794
Core i3-3245
MSRP: $120|Avg: $50
100%
#796
FX-4170
MSRP: $157|Avg: $23
98%
#798
Athlon II X3 415e
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
98%
#799
Core i5-2300
MSRP: $177|Avg: $17
97%
#800
Core i7-4820K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $40
97%
#802
Core i7-3770K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $75
97%
#803
Core i5-4460T
MSRP: $187|Avg: $30
97%
#804
Core i3-3220
MSRP: $117|Avg: $88
96%
#805
Core i7-3770T
MSRP: $278|Avg: $105
96%
#807
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X3 425 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G1820T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1820TAthlon II X3 425
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Rana (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1820TAthlon II X3 425
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1820T and Athlon II X3 425

Intel

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

AMD

Athlon II X3 425

The Athlon II X3 425 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 20 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Rana (2009−2011) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,595 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1820T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X3 425 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Athlon II X3 425 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 2.7 GHz on the Athlon II X3 425 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Athlon II X3 425 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X3 425 uses Rana (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the Athlon II X3 425's 1,595 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G1820T. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X3 425.

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon II X3 425
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
3 / 3+50%
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz+13%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Rana (2009−2011)
PassMark
1,599
1,595
Geekbench 6 Single
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X3 425 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1820T) vs 0 (Athlon II X3 425) — the Celeron G1820T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820T) and AMD AM3 (Athlon II X3 425).

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon II X3 425
Socket
LGA1150
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) / not specified (Athlon II X3 425). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II X3 425 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon II X3 425
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget