Celeron G1820T
VS
Athlon X2 QL-64

Celeron G1820T vs Athlon X2 QL-64

Intel

Celeron G1820T

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 QL-64

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1820T is positioned at rank 500 and the Athlon X2 QL-64 is on rank 665, so the Celeron G1820T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1820T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7797%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7367%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5349%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1611%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1276%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1117%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
640%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
631%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
575%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
575%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
568%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
553%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
545%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
543%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
538%
#256
Ryzen 7 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
98%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
98%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
96%
#500
Celeron G1820T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#501
Core i5-8600K
MSRP: $257|Avg: $100
99%
#505
Athlon II X4 651
MSRP: $92|Avg: $92
97%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-64

#653
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
909%
#654
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
896%
#655
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
822%
#656
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
818%
#657
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
811%
#659
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
783%
#660
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
751%
#661
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
750%
#662
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
730%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
100%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1820T leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon X2 QL-64 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1820TAthlon X2 QL-64
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1820TAthlon X2 QL-64
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1820T and Athlon X2 QL-64

Intel

Celeron G1820T

The Celeron G1820T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,599 points. Launch price was $42.

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-64

The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1820T and Athlon X2 QL-64 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Celeron G1820T versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820T. The Celeron G1820T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1820T scores 1,599 against the Athlon X2 QL-64's 1,614 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-64. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820T vs 0 kB on the Athlon X2 QL-64.

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon X2 QL-64
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+14%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,599
1,614
Geekbench 6 Single
415
Geekbench 6 Multi
629
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1820T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820T versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — the Celeron G1820T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1820T) vs 0 (Athlon X2 QL-64) — the Celeron G1820T offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820T) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 QL-64).

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon X2 QL-64
Socket
LGA1150
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1820T) vs AMD-V (Athlon X2 QL-64). The Celeron G1820T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1820T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1820T rivals Pentium G3220T.

FeatureCeleron G1820TAthlon X2 QL-64
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget