
Celeron G1830

Ryzen 5 3600
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1830
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $147 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (910 vs 1,898).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +439.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 196.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 30.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron G1830.
Trade-offs
- ❌282.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$52 MSRP
- ❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron G1830?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1830 vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1830
The Celeron G1830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,560 points. Launch price was $85.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Celeron G1830 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1830 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G1830 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1830 scores 1,560 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 167.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 496 vs 1,295, a 89.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 910 vs 1,898 (70.4% advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600). L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron G1830 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 6 / 12+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | 4.2 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+29% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | 32 MB (total)+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 1,560 | 17,685+1034% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 496 | 1,295+161% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 910 | 1,898+109% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1830 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1830 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 5 3600 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1830) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1830) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR4-3200+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 128 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1830) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron G1830 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1830 targets Budget, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G1830 rivals Pentium G3220; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | Budget | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1830 was priced at $52, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($52 vs $199), Celeron G1830 was $147 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1830 delivers 30.0 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 99% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1830 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-74% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.0 | 88.9+196% |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














