Celeron G1840
VS
A6-7480

Celeron G1840 vs A6-7480

Intel

Celeron G1840

2 Cores2 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014
VS
AMD

A6-7480

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1840 is positioned at rank 420 and the A6-7480 is on rank 597, so the Celeron G1840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6116%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5779%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4196%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1264%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
876%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
495%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
451%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
451%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
428%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
426%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
422%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
97%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
96%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
98%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
98%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A6-7480

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10432%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9857%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7157%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2156%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1708%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1494%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
856%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
845%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
769%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
769%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
760%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
740%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
729%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
727%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
720%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#597
A6-7480
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
100%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
97%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-7480 (2018) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1840A6-7480
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G1840 (2014) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1840A6-7480
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1840 and A6-7480

Intel

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

AMD

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1840 and A6-7480 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 versus 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 — a 30.3% clock advantage for the A6-7480 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Celeron G1840 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A6-7480 uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840 scores 1,784 against the A6-7480's 1,793 — a 0.5% lead for the A6-7480.

FeatureCeleron G1840A6-7480
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+36%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.5 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm-21%
28 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark
1,784
1,793
Geekbench 6 Single
488
Geekbench 6 Multi
832
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A6-7480 uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 versus 2133 on the A6-7480 — the A6-7480 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840) and FM2+ (A6-7480).

FeatureCeleron G1840A6-7480
Socket
LGA1150
FM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
2133+71000%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1840) vs true (A6-7480). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1840) and Radeon R5 Graphics (A6-7480) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240; A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400.

FeatureCeleron G1840A6-7480
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Radeon R5 Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
Target Use
Budget
Celeron G1840 vs A6-7480