Celeron G1840 vs Phenom II X4 910

Celeron G1840 vs Phenom II X4 910 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1840

2 / 2

1,784

+0.5%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

1,776

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1840 vs Phenom II X4 910 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1840 vs Phenom II X4 910: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1840

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Phenom II X4 910 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $35 MSRP, while Phenom II X4 910 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Phenom II X4 910

2009

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G1840 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,776 vs 1,784).
❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1840 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1840 better than Phenom II X4 910?

Yes. Celeron G1840 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1840 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1840 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1840 is the better buy right now. Celeron G1840 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $35 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (51.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G1840 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1840 vs Phenom II X4 910 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

Phenom II X4 910

The Phenom II X4 910 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1840 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom II X4 910 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X4 910 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 versus 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 910 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Celeron G1840 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Phenom II X4 910 uses Deneb (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840 scores 1,784 against the Phenom II X4 910's 1,776 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1840. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840 vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 910.

Feature	Celeron G1840	Phenom II X4 910
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	6 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Deneb (2009−2011)
PassMark	1,784	1,776
Geekbench 6 Single	488	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	832	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X4 910 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1840	Phenom II X4 910
Socket	LGA1150	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1840) / not specified (Phenom II X4 910). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Phenom II X4 910 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.