Athlon II P320
VS
Celeron G1840

Athlon II P320 vs Celeron G1840

AMD

Athlon II P320

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron G1840

2 Cores2 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II P320 is positioned at rank 622 and the Celeron G1840 is on rank 420, so the Celeron G1840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II P320

#610
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
826%
#611
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
814%
#612
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
747%
#613
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
744%
#614
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
737%
#616
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
712%
#617
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
682%
#618
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
681%
#619
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
663%
#622
Athlon II P320
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#625
Core 3 N355
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#628
Core i5-1335UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $312
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6116%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5779%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4196%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1264%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
876%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
495%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
451%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
451%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
428%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
426%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
422%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
97%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
96%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
98%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
98%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G1840 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II P320 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Athlon II P320 holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $15 (vs $30), it costs 50% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 99% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Celeron G1840.
InsightAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+99%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($15)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II P320 and Celeron G1840

AMD

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P320 and Celeron G1840 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 versus 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840. The Athlon II P320 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G1840 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P320 scores 1,776 against the Celeron G1840's 1,784 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1840. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 189 vs 488, a 88.3% lead for the Celeron G1840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 308 vs 832 (91.9% advantage for the Celeron G1840).

FeatureAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz+33%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Champlain (2010−2011)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,776
1,784
Geekbench 6 Single
189
488+158%
Geekbench 6 Multi
308
832+170%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P320 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G1840 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II P320) vs 16 (Celeron G1840) — the Celeron G1840 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: M880G (Athlon II P320) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840).

FeatureAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
Socket
S1g4
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II P320) vs VT-x (Celeron G1840). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop, Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000; Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

FeatureAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Laptop
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II P320 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Celeron G1840 debuted at $35. At current prices ($15 vs $30), the Athlon II P320 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II P320 delivers 118.4 pts/$ vs 59.5 pts/$ for the Celeron G1840 — making the Athlon II P320 the 66.3% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II P320Celeron G1840
MSRP
$50
$35-30%
Avg Price (30d)
$15-50%
$30
Performance per Dollar
118.4+99%
59.5
Release Date
2010
2014