Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390

Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P320

2 / 2

1,776

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2 / 2

1,771

0.0%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P320

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 72.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 35.5 vs 20.6 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium Dual Core T2390

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,771 vs 1,776).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.6 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II P320 better than Pentium Dual Core T2390?

Yes. Athlon II P320 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II P320 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II P320 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II P320 is the better buy right now. Athlon II P320 comes in $36 cheaper on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $86 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 72.5% better value on MSRP (35.5 vs 20.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II P320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II P320 vs Pentium Dual Core T2390 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

Pentium Dual Core T2390

The Pentium Dual Core T2390 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.86 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,771 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P320 and Pentium Dual Core T2390 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 versus 1.86 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T2390 — a 12.1% clock advantage for the Athlon II P320. The Athlon II P320 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T2390 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P320 scores 1,776 against the Pentium Dual Core T2390's 1,771 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon II P320.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Pentium Dual Core T2390
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz+13%	1.86 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark	1,776	1,771
Geekbench 6 Single	189	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	308	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P320 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core T2390 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Pentium Dual Core T2390
Socket	S1g4	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II P320) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core T2390). Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Pentium Dual Core T2390
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II P320 was priced at $50, while the Pentium Dual Core T2390 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($50 vs $86), Athlon II P320 was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II P320 delivers 35.5 pts/$ vs 20.6 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T2390 — making the Athlon II P320 the 53.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSRP	$50-42%	$86
Performance per Dollar	35.5+72%	20.6
Release Date	2010	2008

Search Athlon II P320 on Amazon

Search Pentium Dual Core T2390 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.