Athlon II P320 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Athlon II P320 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P320

2 / 2

1,776

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2 / 2

1,777

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P320 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P320 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P320

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 2W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,776 vs 1,777).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2008

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 2W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 better than Athlon II P320?

Yes. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 21 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 21 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II P320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g4.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon II P320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II P320 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P320 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82. The Athlon II P320 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P320 scores 1,776 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82's 1,777 — a 0.1% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,776	1,777
Geekbench 6 Single	189	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	308	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P320 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II P320	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Socket	S1g4	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II P320) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82). Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.