
A6-7480

Athlon II P320
A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A6-7480
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Athlon II P320 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon II P320.
Trade-offs
- ❌4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.
Athlon II P320
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7480 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,776 vs 1,793).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while A6-7480 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while A6-7480 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7480.
Quick Answers
So, is A6-7480 better than Athlon II P320?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-7480
The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II P320
The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the A6-7480 and Athlon II P320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 — a 57.6% clock advantage for the A6-7480. The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II P320 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Athlon II P320's 1,776 — a 1% lead for the A6-7480.
| Feature | A6-7480 | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+81% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 1 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,793 | 1,776 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 189 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 308 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II P320 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II P320 — the A6-7480 supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7480 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7480) vs 0 (Athlon II P320) — the A6-7480 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and M880G (Athlon II P320).
| Feature | A6-7480 | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | S1g4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 2133+100% | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7480) vs AMD-V (Athlon II P320). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400; Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.
| Feature | A6-7480 | Athlon II P320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R5 Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















