A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320

AMD

A6-7480

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon II P320

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-7480

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R5 Graphics, while Athlon II P320 needs a discrete GPU.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon II P320.

Trade-offs

  • 4400% higher power demand at 45W vs 1W.

Athlon II P320

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A6-7480 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,776 vs 1,793).
  • Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while A6-7480 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while A6-7480 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-7480.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-7480 better than Athlon II P320?
Yes. A6-7480 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A6-7480 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-7480 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6-7480 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-7480 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II P320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g4.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A6-7480 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-7480 vs Athlon II P320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-7480

The A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 1,793 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the A6-7480 and Athlon II P320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A6-7480 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 — a 57.6% clock advantage for the A6-7480. The A6-7480 uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II P320 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-7480 scores 1,793 against the Athlon II P320's 1,776 — a 1% lead for the A6-7480.

FeatureA6-7480Athlon II P320
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+81%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,793
1,776
Geekbench 6 Single
189
Geekbench 6 Multi
308
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-7480 uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II P320 uses S1g4 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 2133 on the A6-7480 versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II P320 — the A6-7480 supports 100.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-7480 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-7480) vs 0 (Athlon II P320) — the A6-7480 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FM2+ (A6-7480) and M880G (Athlon II P320).

FeatureA6-7480Athlon II P320
Socket
FM2+
S1g4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
2133+100%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A6-7480) vs AMD-V (Athlon II P320). The A6-7480 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R5 Graphics), while the Athlon II P320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-7480 rivals Pentium G4400; Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.

FeatureA6-7480Athlon II P320
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R5 Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
AMD-V
Target Use
Laptop