Athlon II P320 vs E2-9000

Athlon II P320 vs E2-9000 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II P320

2 / 2

1,776

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

E2-9000

2 / 2

1,787

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II P320 vs E2-9000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II P320 vs E2-9000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II P320

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,776 vs 1,787).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while E2-9000 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

E2-9000

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is E2-9000 better than Athlon II P320?

Yes. E2-9000 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, E2-9000 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E2-9000 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E2-9000 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E2-9000 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II P320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (35.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1g4.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E2-9000 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon II P320 vs E2-9000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II P320

The Athlon II P320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,776 points. Launch price was $149.

E2-9000

The E2-9000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: BGA. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,787 points. Launch price was $50.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II P320 and E2-9000 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II P320 versus 2.2 GHz on the E2-9000 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the E2-9000. The Athlon II P320 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E2-9000 uses Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II P320 scores 1,776 against the E2-9000's 1,787 — a 0.6% lead for the E2-9000.

Feature	Athlon II P320	E2-9000
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.1 GHz	2.2 GHz+5%
Base Clock	—	1.8 GHz
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,776	1,787
Geekbench 6 Single	189	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	308	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II P320 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E2-9000 uses BGA (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II P320	E2-9000
Socket	S1g4	BGA
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II P320) / not specified (E2-9000). Primary use case: Athlon II P320 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II P320 rivals Pentium P6000.