Celeron G1840
VS
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Celeron G1840 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Intel

Celeron G1840

2 Cores2 Thrd50 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1840 is positioned at rank 420 and the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is on rank 347, so the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6116%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5779%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4196%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1264%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1001%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
876%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
495%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
451%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
451%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
446%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
434%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
428%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
426%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
422%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
99%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
97%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
96%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
100%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
99%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
98%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
98%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
99%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#335
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
495%
#336
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
488%
#337
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
448%
#338
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
446%
#339
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
442%
#341
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
427%
#342
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
409%
#343
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
409%
#344
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
398%
#347
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G1840 (2014) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCeleron G1840Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Puma (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCeleron G1840Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1840 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

Intel

Celeron G1840

The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.

AMD

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,777 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G1840 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 versus 2.2 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 — a 24% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840. The Celeron G1840 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840 scores 1,784 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82's 1,777 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1840. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1840 vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82.

FeatureCeleron G1840Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+27%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
22 nm-66%
65 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,784
1,777
Geekbench 6 Single
488
Geekbench 6 Multi
832
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1840 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G1840Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Socket
LGA1150
S1g2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G1840) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240.

FeatureCeleron G1840Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget