CPU
GPU
Celeron G1840
Athlon II M320
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1840 is positioned at rank 420 and the Athlon II M320 is on rank 809, so the Celeron G1840 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1840
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II M320
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Caspian (2009) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+101%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($30) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Path of Exile 2
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1840 and Athlon II M320
Celeron G1840
The Celeron G1840 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,784 points. Launch price was $53.
Athlon II M320
The Athlon II M320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,795 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G1840 and Athlon II M320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G1840 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon II M320 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G1840. The Celeron G1840 uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II M320 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1840 scores 1,784 against the Athlon II M320's 1,795 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II M320. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 488 vs 188, a 88.8% lead for the Celeron G1840 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 832 vs 1,955 (80.6% advantage for the Athlon II M320).
| Feature | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+33% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Caspian (2009) |
| PassMark | 1,784 | 1,795 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 488+160% | 188 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 832 | 1,955+135% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G1840 uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II M320 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1840 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon II M320 — the Celeron G1840 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1840 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1840) vs 0 (Athlon II M320) — the Celeron G1840 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1840) and Socket S1g3 (Athlon II M320).
| Feature | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | S1g3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G1840) vs AMD-V (Athlon II M320). The Celeron G1840 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II M320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1840 targets Budget, Athlon II M320 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1840 rivals Pentium G3240; Athlon II M320 rivals Core 2 Duo T6400.
| Feature | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Haswell) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G1840 launched at $35 MSRP, while the Athlon II M320 debuted at $75. At current prices ($30 vs $15), the Athlon II M320 is $15 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1840 delivers 59.5 pts/$ vs 119.7 pts/$ for the Athlon II M320 — making the Athlon II M320 the 67.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1840 | Athlon II M320 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-53% | $75 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $15-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.5 | 119.7+101% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G1840 and Athlon II M320
