Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-8200Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-8200Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-8200Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (750 vs 858).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Core i5-8200Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌920% higher power demand at 51W vs 5W.

Core i5-8200Y

2018

Why buy it

✅+14.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 51W, a 46W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,259).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-8200Y better than Celeron G3930?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-8200Y is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core i5-8200Y also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-8200Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-8200Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G3930 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2017 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (53.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-8200Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G3930 vs Core i5-8200Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Core i5-8200Y

The Core i5-8200Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $291.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-8200Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i5-8200Y — a 29.4% clock advantage for the Core i5-8200Y (base: 2.9 GHz vs 1.3 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-8200Y uses Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Core i5-8200Y's 2,245 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3930. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 750 vs 858, a 13.4% lead for the Core i5-8200Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930 vs 4 MB on the Core i5-8200Y.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Core i5-8200Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz	3.9 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+123%	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	4 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Amber Lake-Y (2018−2021)
PassMark	2,259	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	750	858+14%
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-8200Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G3930 versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Core i5-8200Y — the Celeron G3930 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G3930 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G3930) vs 10 (Core i5-8200Y) — the Celeron G3930 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H110,B250,H270,Z270 (Celeron G3930) and Amber Lake-Y (Core i5-8200Y).

Feature	Celeron G3930	Core i5-8200Y
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400+29%	LPDDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+300%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G3930) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-8200Y). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics 610 (Celeron G3930) and UHD Graphics 615 (Core i5-8200Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget, Core i5-8200Y targets Tablet/2-in-1. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560; Core i5-8200Y rivals Athlon 300U.