Celeron G3930 vs Pentium P6100

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930 vs Pentium P6100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930 vs Pentium P6100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $58 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 139.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 53.8 vs 22.4 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Pentium P6100 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌45.7% higher power demand at 51W vs 35W.

Pentium P6100

2010

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 51W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron G3930 across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,259).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.4 vs 53.8 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930 better than Pentium P6100?

Yes. Celeron G3930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 46 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930 comes in $58 cheaper on MSRP at $42 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 139.6% better value on MSRP (53.8 vs 22.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930 vs Pentium P6100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Pentium P6100

The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930 and Pentium P6100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930 (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6100 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Pentium P6100's 2,245 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3930. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G3930 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Pentium P6100
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+45%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,259	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	750	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6100 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Pentium P6100
Socket	LGA1151	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930) / not specified (Pentium P6100). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Pentium P6100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Pentium P6100
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 610	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G3930 was priced at $42, while the Pentium P6100 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($42 vs $100), Celeron G3930 was $58 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G3930 delivers 53.8 pts/$ vs 22.4 pts/$ for the Pentium P6100 — making the Celeron G3930 the 82.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Pentium P6100
MSRP	$42-58%	$100
Performance per Dollar	53.8+140%	22.4
Release Date	2017	2010

Search Celeron G3930 on Amazon

Search Pentium P6100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.