Celeron G3930 vs Turion II N530

Celeron G3930 vs Turion II N530 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G3930

2 / 2

2,259

+0.6%

2,245

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G3930 vs Turion II N530 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G3930 vs Turion II N530: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G3930

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 610, while Turion II N530 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while Turion II N530 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌2450% higher power demand at 51W vs 2W.

Turion II N530

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 51W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,245 vs 2,259).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G3930 better than Turion II N530?

Yes. Celeron G3930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G3930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G3930 is the better buy right now. Celeron G3930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (53.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G3930 vs Turion II N530 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G3930

The Celeron G3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 51 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 2,259 points. Launch price was $42.

Turion II N530

The Turion II N530 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron G3930 and Turion II N530 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Celeron G3930 versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II N530 — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G3930. The Celeron G3930 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II N530 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G3930 scores 2,259 against the Turion II N530's 2,245 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G3930.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Turion II N530
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,259	2,245
Geekbench 6 Single	750	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G3930 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II N530 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G3930	Turion II N530
Socket	LGA1151	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2400	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G3930) / not specified (Turion II N530). The Celeron G3930 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 610), while the Turion II N530 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G3930 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G3930 rivals Pentium G4560.