PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G530T vs Celeron N2940 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G530T vs Celeron N2940: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G530T

2011

Why buy it

✅+60% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Celeron N2940.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (655 vs 850).
❌Launch MSRP is still $50 MSRP, while Celeron N2940 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌400% higher power demand at 35W vs 7W.

Celeron N2940

2014

Why buy it

✅+29.8% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (240 vs 384).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G530T.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2940 better than Celeron G530T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G530T is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2940 pulls ahead with 29.8% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2940 is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2940 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2940 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $50 MSRP, and it still gives you 29.8% better Geekbench multi-core. Celeron G530T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (21.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2940 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G530T vs Celeron N2940 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G530T

The Celeron G530T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,056 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N2940

The Celeron N2940 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.25 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,054 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G530T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron N2940 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron N2940 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron G530T versus 2.25 GHz on the Celeron N2940 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2940 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Celeron G530T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2940 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G530T scores 1,056 against the Celeron N2940's 1,054 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron G530T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 384 vs 240, a 46.2% lead for the Celeron G530T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 655 vs 850 (25.9% advantage for the Celeron N2940). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G530T vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2940.

Feature	Celeron G530T	Celeron N2940
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.25 GHz+13%
Base Clock	2 GHz+9%	1.83 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,056	1,054
Geekbench 6 Single	384+60%	240
Geekbench 6 Multi	655	850+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G530T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2940 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G530T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G530T) vs 4 (Celeron N2940) — the Celeron G530T offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Celeron G530T) and SoC (Celeron N2940).

Feature	Celeron G530T	Celeron N2940
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G530T) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron N2940) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G530T targets Desktop, Celeron N2940 targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron G530T rivals Pentium G630T; Celeron N2940 rivals AMD A6-6310.

Feature	Celeron G530T	Celeron N2940
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Desktop	Budget Laptop