
Celeron G555

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Celeron G555 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G555 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Cyberpunk 2077
Celeron G555 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G555
2012Why buy it
- β Costs $82 less on MSRP ($52 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- β Delivers 161.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $134 MSRP).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium Dual Core SU4100 needs a discrete GPU.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Pentium Dual Core SU4100.
Trade-offs
- β3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
2009Why buy it
- β Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (1,409 vs 1,427).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 27.4 PassMark/$ ($134 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Celeron G555 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G555.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron G555 better than Pentium Dual Core SU4100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G555 vs Pentium Dual Core SU4100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G555
The Celeron G555 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $89.

Pentium Dual Core SU4100
The Pentium Dual Core SU4100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000β2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,409 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G555 and Pentium Dual Core SU4100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G555 versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 β a 70% clock advantage for the Celeron G555. The Celeron G555 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses NetBurst (2000β2006) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G555 scores 1,427 against the Pentium Dual Core SU4100's 1,409 β a 1.3% lead for the Celeron G555.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz+108% | 1.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | β |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011β2013) | NetBurst (2000β2006) |
| PassMark | 1,427+1% | 1,409 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 398 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 742 | β |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G555 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G555) / not specified (Pentium Dual Core SU4100). The Celeron G555 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G555 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G555 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | β |
| Unlocked | No | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G555 was priced at $52, while the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 came in at $134. On launch pricing ($52 vs $134), Celeron G555 was $82 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G555 delivers 27.4 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core SU4100 β making the Celeron G555 the 89.2% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G555 | Pentium Dual Core SU4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52-61% | $134 |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.4+161% | 10.5 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2009 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














