Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 5 3600

CPU

GPU

Celeron G6900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2022

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 5 3600

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2019

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900T

2 / 2

3,668

0.0%

17,685

+382.1%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅+29.1% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Costs $157 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 710, while Ryzen 5 3600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 3600 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 5 3600

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +168.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,898 vs 2,450).
❌
373.8% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$42 MSRP
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 3600 better than Celeron G6900T?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 5 3600 is ahead with a 168.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900T pulls ahead with 29.1% better Geekbench multi-core. Ryzen 5 3600 also has the bigger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G6900T is the stronger fit. You are getting 29.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 3600 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 5 3600 comes in 373.8% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 168.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron G6900T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 29.1% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 1.8% better value on MSRP (88.9 vs 87.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible LGA1700 + DDR5 setup, Celeron G6900T can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 6/12. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 5 3600

The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 5 3600 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 40% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 131.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,400 vs 1,295, a 7.8% lead for the Celeron G6900T that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,450 vs 1,898 (25.4% advantage for the Celeron G6900T). L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 5 3600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	6 / 12+200%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.2 GHz+50%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+700%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,668	17,685+382%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,500
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400+8%	1,295
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450+29%	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Celeron G6900T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 5 3600
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Ryzen 5 3600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T; Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 5 3600
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	Yes
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	Gaming/Budget Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($42 vs $199), Celeron G6900T was $157 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 1.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP	$42-79%	$199
Performance per Dollar	87.3	88.9+2%
Release Date	2022	2019

Search Celeron G6900T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 5 3600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.