Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X

CPU

GPU

Celeron G6900T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2022

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Ryzen family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum

Celeron G6900T

2 / 2

3,668

0.0%

22,430

+511.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G6900T

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $287 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 87.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 710, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,668 vs 22,430).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +227.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 87.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Celeron G6900T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G6900T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G6900T.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Celeron G6900T?

Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 227.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 511.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 227.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the stronger fit. You are getting 511.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is still the better call for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 683.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $42 MSRP, and it still gives you a 227.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G6900T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. Giving up that much average FPS in the shared benchmark data is simply too much for that budget trade-off.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G6900T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of AM4. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Celeron G6900T vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G6900T

The Celeron G6900T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 3,668 points. Launch price was $69.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G6900T packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Celeron G6900T versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 44.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Celeron G6900T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G6900T scores 3,668 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 143.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Celeron G6900T vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	8 / 16+300%
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	4.4 GHz+57%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	32 MB+700%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+40860%
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark	3,668	22,430+512%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G6900T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Celeron G6900T versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Celeron G6900T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Celeron G6900T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760 (Celeron G6900T) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket	LGA1700	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+50%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	24+20%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron G6900T) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X). The Celeron G6900T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 710), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G6900T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G6900T rivals Pentium Gold G7400T.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 710	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Low Power Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G6900T was priced at $42, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($42 vs $329), Celeron G6900T was $287 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G6900T delivers 87.3 pts/$ vs 68.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Celeron G6900T the 24.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G6900T	Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP	$42-87%	$329
Performance per Dollar	87.3+28%	68.2
Release Date	2022	2019

Search Celeron G6900T on Amazon

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.