Celeron J1800 vs Celeron 877
Celeron J1800
Celeron 877
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1800 is positioned at rank 750 and the Celeron 877 is on rank 1097, so the Celeron J1800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1800
Performance Per Dollar Celeron 877
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1800 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1800 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1800 and Celeron 877
Celeron J1800
The Celeron J1800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 November 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.58 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 820 points. Launch price was $72.
Celeron 877
The Celeron 877 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 July 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 805 points. Launch price was $86.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron J1800 and Celeron 877 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.58 GHz on the Celeron J1800 versus 1.4 GHz on the Celeron 877 — a 59.3% clock advantage for the Celeron J1800 (base: 2.41 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The Celeron J1800 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron 877 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1800 scores 820 against the Celeron 877's 805 — a 1.8% lead for the Celeron J1800. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1800 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 877.
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.58 GHz+84% | 1.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.41 GHz+72% | 1.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 820+2% | 805 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 150 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 250 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1800 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 877 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Celeron 877 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1800) vs 16 (Celeron 877) — the Celeron 877 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1800) and HM65,HM67,HM75,HM76,HM77 (Celeron 877).
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 16+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1800) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron 877) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1800 targets Low Power, Celeron 877 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron J1800 rivals Pentium J2850; Celeron 877 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Celeron J1800 | Celeron 877 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Low Power | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1800 and Celeron 877
